BDSM…Normal, Unique, Sickening?

I would not prefer to do BDSM because, from my personal experience, I never really felt pleasure coming out of pain. However, to some, BDSM is considered a unique method of sexual expression, and, to some, it is considered sexual abuse. It may be considered sexual abuse if one of the parties does not favor it, and, therefore, views it as being violent. It may mean more than just being chains and whips, and maybe power, privilege, and gender equality. If two people want to perform BDSM together, the main guiding principles are meant to be safety, hurt but not cause harm, no self-destruction, have full consent, and never be under the influence of any form of substance. In conclusion, these principles reveal how BDSM tends to be misunderstood by society, especially since because society rarely realizes that two people may be comfortable with performing BDSM. Therefore, BDSM is a healthy form of sexual expression. Also, many would be suprised knowing which kind of people do it. In particular, according to the National Coalition of Sexual Freedom, “You do not have to be afraid of people who engage in SM. SM players are doctors, lawyers, teachers, construction workers, secretaries, and everything else you can imagine.” Since sadomasochism is consented between adults, it is not criminal behavior. Sadomasochism is not abuse if trust, honesty, and COMMUNICATION are exchanged between two consenting adults. Finally, Sadomasochism is not non-consensual. Why? Because one does not consent to be emotionally damaged, physically abused, or mentally abused.

Dyrek, P. (2011, November 10). Workshop uncovers healthy side of sexual expression, BDSM. Retrieved March 10, 2015, from http://www.lehighvalleylive.com/thebrownandwhiteblog/index.ssf/2011/11/bdsm_the_reality_behind_the_wh.html

BDSM Defined: An Exploration of Adult Sexuality and Lifestyles. (2004, January 1). Retrieved March 10, 2015, from http://www.teramis.com/kink/bdsm_defined.htm

 

One thought on “BDSM…Normal, Unique, Sickening?

  1. Two research articles included for Side A 0/5 pts
    No sources were provided for Side A.

    Two research articles included for Side B 0/5 pts
    No sources were provided for Side B.

    Summary of Side A and Side B 0/20 pts
    No summary of the sides was present in the blog.

    Who you agree with and why? 5/15 pts
    (Include strengths and weaknesses)
    You included some interesting points about why you chose the side you did, but there was no research to back anything up.

    APA Formatting/ Grammar/ Length 0/5 pts
    Much too short; did not include the required sections.

    Total 5/50 total

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *