GDES Classwork

-Part 1-

After using the TimeTracker document to keep a record of how my time was spent during this past week, I found that I naturally create a schedule for myself. It is important to me that I have a ‘regimen’ of when I do things so that I can stay focused on each individual task. And then, like I can see most weekends being for people, the structure goes away and I have time to relax from the last week and prepare for the next week simultaneously. During the weekends I make much more time for me to do non-school related activities, and to stay in touch with family.

-Part 2-

©2015, Loren Gamez
THE RESEMBLANCE IS PUZZLING
Digital print, 20 x 20 inches

This piece is a personal accomplishment for several reasons. The first of which is that it is a portrait of my twin sister and I (myself on the left and her on the right), and shows how we are both similar and different in our own unique ways, and how I feel as though we are two parts of a whole and complete each other in many aspects. This was also the largest project that I had done at the time, so getting it finished on time was important. Additionally, I think this piece reflects my point of view because I embrace my sister’s disability, as well as the entire community of people with special needs, and that is very important to my family and I. It also reflects my interests because I am devoted to improving my artwork, and I believe that this piece (compared to previous digital works) shows how much I have learned since my interest in graphic design began.

Exploring the Gestalt principles in music is certainly something that I hadn’t thought about before listening to Spoon. However, once I did listen to the podcast and to the song (several times), it began to make sense how there are specific Gestalt principles that can be heavily applied to music.

Firstly, there was the element of repetition. The drummer, Jim Eno, points out that they played around with different types of music, but with each beat, there is a specific repetition to it. There is also a distinction between the repetition during the chorus and during other parts of the song. There are different types of music that get repeated at different parts, but in the end, it creates a sense of unity in the song because there is an overarching drumbeat continuous in the background.

Additionally, there is a sense of continuity in the song. While there are different types of music in the song, the transition from one beat from another is seamless, and doesn’t break up the song and cause the words or meaning of it to become lost.

I feel that these two Gestalt principles in general are what drive most forms of music to be considered art. We as humans are always looking for patterns, and repetition + continuity is a pattern that is, well, music to our ears.

I’ll admit it. I didn’t understand Stan Brakhage’s video at all. For at least the first three times I watched it. But then I started to ask myself why the video was 2 1/2 minutes long, why he would compose the images in that way, and why he titled the video “Stellar”.

I did a bit of Googling on Brakhage’s films when I was stumped the first time, and I found a wiki archive that listed several of the films he had done, and their lengths. To answer the last question first, I think there’s a point to why that particular video is nearly 2 1/2 minutes long. It tells a story. The film begins very slowly, and I believe this is a parallel to the beginning of time, or life. The span of time between images is long, as is the amount of time that you see any specific image. However, as it progresses, the time between images shortens and the images flash by faster than the viewer can keep up with. I think this parallel is a signal of how time progresses and seems to pass us by so quickly near the end that we do not take the time to enjoy the things we see.

Secondly, I was unsure how the video related at all to the Gestalt principles. The grouping of images seems random at first, but when I paid closer attention to ways that they could be categorized, I noticed that they had predominantly cool, dark colors. This of course is reflective of our perceptions of what the universe looks like beyond the atmosphere of the earth.

Additionally, the proximity of images changes. Like I mentioned before with time, the images seem more distant from each other in the beginning, but by the end of the video they are nearly split seconds apart.

Brakhage’s choice of composition still confuses me, and watching other videos of his doesn’t help, but I eventually opened my mind to the abstractedness of the work and was able to appreciate his unique creativity and composition.

I found Amy Tan’s talk on where creativity comes from to be an interesting insight on the matter, and I liked the way that she addressed the matter as something that can vary depending on each individual life experience. She points out the way that outside forces are at work constantly in a person’s life, and each thing that happens influences how someone goes about expressing their creativity. I agree with her that there is an element of ambiguity to being creative or having an inspiration for a creative expression.

However, I don’t agree with her when she says that ambiguity is necessary. I believe that it can be a useful tool for expression, but I believe that any work can be done just as well without ambiguity. Personally, I find things easier to understand if the meaning is clear on the surface, not muddled with ambiguity, causing someone to search for the meaning. In my life, I can draw inspiration more from the things that I can easily understand than the things that confuse me.

Aside from that, I do agree with her when she states that there is more than “random luck” at work. The outside forces that influence a person’s life also influence their understanding of the world, and a person can always draw upon these coincidences as guidance or assurance for their work.

Overall, I do believe that it is important for an artist to draw their inspiration and creativity from many sources, both of the supernatural nature and in the world we live in today. I think that creativity depends on the kind of life that a person chooses to live, and that their experiences will almost always reflect onto their work.

I thought that Hara’s article gave some interesting insight to the evolution of design. She has an abstract idea that all design is descended from sticks and vessels, and that an eye for complex design is assumed to equal power. I found these two ideas to be quite interesting, although the idea that all design is descended from sticks and vessels to be a little far-fetched. But I do agree with Hara that we as humans have come to see people who are capable of creating complex designs as powerful, in a sense. We admire their skills because many of us are not capable of accomplishing something like that, and thus we hold them in higher esteem than the “normal” people around us.

Additionally, the article makes clear that design is essential to consumers of the “modern” society, to the economy. I also find this to be true. Who wants something that is simply generic over something with an attractive design to go with its usefulness?

And it makes another point that there are many types of design, some that go overlooked. It almost seems overwhelming to me just what the word ‘design’ encompasses, and how many styles there are. It’s a neat thought, though, that design is everything and everywhere, and it just depends on who uses it and for what purpose. It can vary depending on the time, on the country, and even on what is used to create the art (ie. a paintbrush and canvas versus a computer program).

Overall, the article enhances the idea that “beauty is in the eye of the beholder”, or that a design depends on the designer. And there are many to choose from, take influence from, or stray away from to create something new and original. The possibilities, it seems, are endless.

I liked reading Daniel Pink’s article “High Concept, High Touch” because I feel as though he breaks down the everyday mind into parts, but also emphasizes how success is drawn from people who utilize both parts to create a cohesive whole. People who learn to balance their creativity with their intelligence can make a greater impact for their profession, and are able to work on a higher level.

Pink separates the left brain and the right brain and discusses how they are separately essential to a person’s abilities, but when they are used together, a phenomenal result occurs. Someone who is an “L-Directed” thinker can think logically, and are often seen as essential to the economy or work force. Being “L-Directed Thinking” is preferred in many businesses. However, people who are “R-Directed Thinking” are often overlooked and underestimated when it comes to their performance. Contrary to what many people think, the creative “R-Directed Thinking” people are just as essential because they are able to open their minds up to options that an “L-Directed Thinking” person might not see as logical, but are options worth trying. In fact, as Pink points out, there are studies that say that being an “R-Directed” thinker can sometimes be more influential in the present work force because of their innovative natures. Sure, it’s good to be able to think logically or calculate difficult sums, but being an enjoyable personality and to be innovative, as most “R-Directed Thinking” people tend to be, is just as important.

Another interesting point he makes is that a person’s IQ or SAT score has nothing to do with their performance in the work force. I find myself agreeing with this quite strongly. I know personally that some people are just not capable of performing well on a test, but they are quite intelligent individuals. Without delving into the controversial standardized test, I do believe that the criteria for a person’s success should be something other than a test score. I absolutely love Professor Sternberg’s “Rainbow Project”, because it does just this. It takes the “L-Directed Thinking” preference out of the equation and instead allows for the “R-Directed Thinking” personalities to shine and demonstrate their capabilities.

Lastly, I agree with Pink’s conclusion that “L-Directed Thinking” is necessarily, but it is not all that there is, and that we need to better understand the “R-Directed Thinking” to provide for a better whole, instead of settling for the better half.

I found Flusser’s “The Photograph” article to be very intriguing. It uses the point of view of an artist to dissect photographs into a very complex work of art that many, especially those who are not artists, do not quite understand. I found myself agreeing with much of what he was saying, especially about how a photograph is more than it seems at first and often requires ‘decoding’.

Flusser seems to emphasize that a photograph, in itself, is not simply a matter that is black and white. A photograph is an expression that allows for a complex subject to be broken down into a more understandable method of observation. A photograph allows for both a simple understanding in the form of an image on the surface, as well as a more complex, deeper story that an artist tells through the setting of the captured photograph. I find this to be very true as I think back on the photographs that I have seen, whether professional or taken by a family member. They are more than something to admire on the surface. They scream for your attention through the artist’s style, and how the subjects of the image are placed. Some are used for memories, good and bad, and others are used to propel one’s critical thinking.

Additionally, Flusser makes the point that color photographs are more ‘abstract’ from a black-and-white photograph. I feel as though he thinks that the color in the photograph distracts from the true intent of the photo and its story, and makes the viewer have to think more deeply about it in order to truly understand the artist’s purpose. He goes on to say that a black-and-white photograph is more ‘true’ than a color photograph, and perhaps it is for this reason alone. Without color to distract the viewer, one can question why the artist chose to take that photo and what the artist wants the viewer to really see.

Overall, the article discusses Flusser’s analysis of how the point of view of an artist is something that is complex and often requires for one to really think critically about the purpose of the work, especially in the case of ‘decoding’ photographs, and I admire his point of view.

-Part 1-

1) The first article’s main point is that artists are as important in the business world as any other kind of entrepreneur, and that all businesses can learn things from them. Artists are successful entrepreneurs especially because of their nature to be innovative and to persevere, something that all entrepreneurs could use to be successful. The second article’s main point is to enforce the idea that artists are entrepreneurs because they have a passion for what they do and don’t let many things get in the way of their vision, but they occasionally lack the support of others to turn their visions into a reality.

2) Artists can learn to think of their passion as a “team sport” and to accept the support they might need to turn a fantasy into a reality and to flourish.

3) I do feel as though artists are entrepreneurs, primarily because they embrace what is sometimes intangible, and they find a way to make it tangible through their art. Like entrepreneurs, they can take things that don’t exist, or things that exist only in the mind, and show them to the world in a unique, often nostalgic way.

4) While I agree with most of the characteristics of artists, the one that stands out the most is the ninth, the one that says that “artists are great storytellers”. The inspiration for an artist’s work is almost always as important, and occasionally more important, than the finished product itself. “It is the journey, not the destination” goes the saying, and this can be applied to an artist’s work as well as an entrepreneur’s innovation.

5) I would add that artists are motivated because of their passion, and this motivation leads them to high performances and perseverance. Likewise, entrepreneurs need to be motivated to turn their ideas into a reality.

6) No additional notes.

-Part 2-

1) I do have grit according to the test, and I believe it is because I work hard and I set personal goals for myself.

2) To increase my grit I could remain dedicated to projects that are important to myself and/or others, regardless of how much time they may take. Additionally, I could refrain from any distractions that might take my attention away from being successful and meeting my goals.