Final Reflection

My views of technology in the classroom have dramatically changed since the beginning of this semester. When I came in, my views of technology integration were parallel with what I remembered from elementary school. Most of my memories of using technology in the classroom consisted of writing out journal entries on an early form of Microsoft Word, playing a math game, or spending my free time on Oregon Trail. While these could all be easily argued as beneficial uses of technology (especially for the mid-late 90s), it was a rare treat that we actually got to use the computer. I have been constantly impressed with how much simpler technology integration is now, as opposed to when I was a child.

Beyond my surprise at the surplus of technology in current classrooms, I found it interesting to see how easily it is to use technology just to meet the requirements. This class taught me that it is important to use technology to do something that you could not do if you did not have a computer or iPad in front of you. I was interested to see that how the use technology changed an entire lesson. Through the lessons that I observed online and in class, it was apparent how much more exciting learning became when I knew I got to explore something new on my own through a website or tool on the computer. The only thing I am still unsure about is, how can we use these websites in classrooms where there are only 2-4 computers, much like almost all of the AISD classrooms I have observed?

This whole question has been a reoccurring theme for me throughout the semester. I am always left thinking, “this is so great, but how can I use any of it if I don’t have the resources?” It’s an interesting question to ask, and I believe that over the years technology will become more and more apparent in the classroom. Only time will tell how my use of technology will pan out with limited resources, but I am certain that I will make an effort to include a plethora of activities that involve technology in my future classroom.

Transforming American Education: Learning Powered By Technology Reflection

I am unsure as to whether or not I agree with the overarching theme of this article. In the summary, it says that one of President Obama’s goals is to increase the number of people going to college. Half of me wholeheartedly agrees with this mentality, but then the other half is left wondering, “is that the only use for schools?” It might be the idealist in me, but I think that schools should be used for learning for personal satisfaction and wellness and not only for, “economic growth and prosperity.” The main goal of learning should not be to create a new generation of people who can take care of the country as we grow older, but rather to create a generation that seeks out knowledge and learning which, in turn, will more than likely bring about a generation with new, great ideas. As teachers, I think we need to teach children to, “learn to think,” much like St. Edward’s has been teaching us in the years we have been in college.

The question then is, how do we manage this idea with standards? The article points out ways we can, “redesign structures and processes for effectiveness, efficiency, and flexibility,” and it cites that technology will help with that. I think this whole idea of including technology into the classroom is extremely beneficial to managing the idea of promoting thinking, while still meeting standards. It allows for more personalized lessons and give students an opportunity to see materials taught in a way that might make more sense to them. Since technology is becoming more and more readily available, it also offers students techniques for learning through technology either on their home computer or at a local library. Ultimately, technology creates a better classroom for both teacher and student, and will hopefully help to make it easier for us as future teachers to teach for the students, rather than for the test.

A Teacher’s Place In The Digital Divide Reflection

The first part of this article that particularly stuck out to me was the short section on school access. The idea that students in higher socioeconomic schools have more technology than lower socioeconomic schools was something that I had heard of many times. This did not come to a surprise to me at all. What surprised me was the comment on giving newer technology to students in higher performing classes. This is an issue that I had never really thought about before. I was in predominately higher performing classes throughout my public school years but I did have a few “on-level” classes too. Looking back, I am now aware of this gap between technology uses. The only classes I ever got to use the school laptops in were my AP and pre-AP classes. This leads me to the question, why? Why would we give students who are already performing above the standards access to technology? Would it not be a better use of our time and technology to give this to students who are performing below or on par with the standards? The integration of technology into the classroom can be the difference between a student being completely lost on a topic to finally understanding something that they had been struggling with for a long period of time.

I’m also always interested in the topic of the generational gap. While I am able to stay current with the times as a young person, I wonder if 30 years from now I will still be able to keep up with my students and their use of technology. I think the fact that we are growing up surrounded by so much technology (and learning through technology!) is beneficial to us as future teachers. Seeing the benefits of technology in the classroom first-hand is an important step to helping bridge that generational gap between teachers and students.

Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century Reflection

The article Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century brought up quite a few interesting points that I had not heard of before and was surprised by. Henry Jenkins writes about the reasoning behind why we need to extend technology into the classroom of underprivileged students and how we can bring about the change in our classroom or school.

I was most intrigued by some of the statistics presented at the beginning of the article. He presented evidence that females are more likely than males to use social activities online. It might be because I am a female who loved blogging all throughout my teenage years, but this statistic did not surprise me at all. Comparing this to my life, I have noticed a pattern of more females using blogging sites and making more use out of social media sites like Facebook  or Myspace. I was also intrigued by the lack of differences in participation levels when it came to ethnicity. I had not ever thought about how race and ethnicity played into this scenario, but it seems to make sense that the use of online participation is an even playing field.

However, I was extremely surprised by some of the statistics that he provided about urban youth being more likely to create media than suburban or rural youth. The study was done in 2005 and left out a lot of variables, but the percentage differences between the three groups was surprising. I was left wondering, why would urban youth be the leaders in this group? If they are the group that is stereotypically left with the least resources, why are they performing the best? And ultimately, if they are the group that is already performing the best, are we doing anything to bring the suburban youth and rural youth groups to the same level as the urban youth?