Transforming American Education: Learning Powered By Technology Reflection

I am unsure as to whether or not I agree with the overarching theme of this article. In the summary, it says that one of President Obama’s goals is to increase the number of people going to college. Half of me wholeheartedly agrees with this mentality, but then the other half is left wondering, “is that the only use for schools?” It might be the idealist in me, but I think that schools should be used for learning for personal satisfaction and wellness and not only for, “economic growth and prosperity.” The main goal of learning should not be to create a new generation of people who can take care of the country as we grow older, but rather to create a generation that seeks out knowledge and learning which, in turn, will more than likely bring about a generation with new, great ideas. As teachers, I think we need to teach children to, “learn to think,” much like St. Edward’s has been teaching us in the years we have been in college.

The question then is, how do we manage this idea with standards? The article points out ways we can, “redesign structures and processes for effectiveness, efficiency, and flexibility,” and it cites that technology will help with that. I think this whole idea of including technology into the classroom is extremely beneficial to managing the idea of promoting thinking, while still meeting standards. It allows for more personalized lessons and give students an opportunity to see materials taught in a way that might make more sense to them. Since technology is becoming more and more readily available, it also offers students techniques for learning through technology either on their home computer or at a local library. Ultimately, technology creates a better classroom for both teacher and student, and will hopefully help to make it easier for us as future teachers to teach for the students, rather than for the test.

A Teacher’s Place In The Digital Divide Reflection

The first part of this article that particularly stuck out to me was the short section on school access. The idea that students in higher socioeconomic schools have more technology than lower socioeconomic schools was something that I had heard of many times. This did not come to a surprise to me at all. What surprised me was the comment on giving newer technology to students in higher performing classes. This is an issue that I had never really thought about before. I was in predominately higher performing classes throughout my public school years but I did have a few “on-level” classes too. Looking back, I am now aware of this gap between technology uses. The only classes I ever got to use the school laptops in were my AP and pre-AP classes. This leads me to the question, why? Why would we give students who are already performing above the standards access to technology? Would it not be a better use of our time and technology to give this to students who are performing below or on par with the standards? The integration of technology into the classroom can be the difference between a student being completely lost on a topic to finally understanding something that they had been struggling with for a long period of time.

I’m also always interested in the topic of the generational gap. While I am able to stay current with the times as a young person, I wonder if 30 years from now I will still be able to keep up with my students and their use of technology. I think the fact that we are growing up surrounded by so much technology (and learning through technology!) is beneficial to us as future teachers. Seeing the benefits of technology in the classroom first-hand is an important step to helping bridge that generational gap between teachers and students.