DNA Fingerprinting

 

 

 

 

 

The Following are examples of STR in real life pictures and the  first case that started it as well as the OJ Simpson case.

Certain labs that do not follow the right protocol can cause the criminal to get away and the victim as well as his/her family not to get justice.  Recently Houston PD/Crime Lab has been under fire for their lab ethics.

 

 

pic

 

 

 
Figure 1
Two of the DNA profiles that led to the conviction of Tommie Lee Andrews for rape in 1987. The two DNA probes seen here were used to characterize DNA isolated from the victim, the semen left by the rapist, and the suspect. The dark channels are multiband controls. There is a clear match between the suspect’s DNA and the DNA of the rapist’s semen in these.

 

  • Compare the restriction endonuclease patterns of the semen to that of the suspect Andrews. You can see that the suspect’s two patterns match that of the rapist (and are not at all like those of the victim). Clearly the semen collected from the rape victim and the blood sample from the suspect came from the same person. The suspect was Tommie Lee Andrews, and on November 6, 1987, the jury returned a verdict of guilty. Andrews became the first person in the United States to be convicted of a crime based on DNA evidence

 

pic 2

 

Figure 2
The DNA profiles of O. J. Simpson and blood samples from the murder scene of his former wife from his highly publicized and controversial murder trial in 1995.

oj

 

http://elitedaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/elite-daily-oj-simpson-jail.jpg 

As the man who analyzed Andrews’ DNA says: “It’s like leaving your name, address, and social security number at the scene of the crime. It’s that precise.” Of course, laboratory analyses of DNA samples must be carried out properlysloppy procedures could lead to a wrongful conviction. After widely publicized instances of questionable lab procedures, national standards are being developed.

The genomes of several organisms have been completely sequenced. When DNA is digested with restriction endonucleases, distinctive profiles on electrophoresis gels can be used to identify the individual that was the source of the tissue.

 

http://www.txtwriter.com/Backgrounders/Genetech/GEpage14.html

Forensics, DNA Fingerprinting, and CODIS

Quick Overview

DNA is Present in everyone as well as STRs.  CODIS uses 13 core STRs .  Upon the FBI-determined STR allele frequencies reveals that the probability of two unrelated Caucasians having identical STR profiles, or so-called “DNA fingerprints,” is approximately 1 in 575 trillion. Because forensics is a science largely rooted in probabilities, even a confirmed “match” does not supply concrete proof of guilt.  If for examples only 4 of the STR are matched on a small sample this does not mean is was that exact person

Overview

    DNA is present in nearly every cell of our bodies, and we leave cells behind everywhere we go without even realizing it. Flakes of skin, drops of blood, hair, and saliva all contain DNA that can be used to identify us. In fact, the study of forensics, commonly used by police departments and prosecutors around the world, frequently relies upon these small bits of shed DNA to link criminals to the crimes they commit. This fascinating science is often portrayed on popular television shows as a simple, exact, and infallible method of finding a perpetrator and bringing him or her to justice. In truth, however, teasing out a DNA fingerprint and determining the likelihood of a match between a suspect and a crime scene is a complicated process that relies upon probability to a greaterextent than most people realize. Government-administered DNA databases, such as the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS), do help speed the process, but they also bring to light complex ethical issues involving the rights of victims and suspects alike. Thus, understanding the ways in which DNA evidence is obtained and analyzed, what this evidence can tell investigators, and how this evidence is used within the legal system is critical to appreciating the true ethical and legal impact of forensic genetics.How Does DNA Identification Work?

How Does DNA Identification Work?

  • Although the overwhelming majority of the human genome is identical across all individuals, there are regions of variation. This variation can occur anywhere in the genome, including areas that are not known to code for proteins. Investigation into these noncoding regions reveals repeated units of DNA that vary in length among individuals. Scientists have found that one particular type of repeat, short tandem repeat (STR), is relatively easily measured and compared between different individuals. In fact, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has identified 13 core STR loci that are now routinely used in the identification of individuals in the United States, and Interpol has identified 10 standard loci for the United Kingdom and Europe

As its name implies, an STR contains repeating units of a short (typically three- to four-nucleotide) DNA sequence. Because there 12 different alleles for this STR, there are therefore 78 different possible genotypes, or pairs of alleles. Specifically, there are 12 homozygotes, in which the same allele is received from each parent, as well as 66 heterozygotes, in which the two alleles are different.

 

The Statistical Strength of a 13-STR Profile

Assuming that all 13 STRs follow the principle of independent assortment (and they should, as they are scattered widely across the genome) and that the population randomly mates, a statistical calculation based upon the FBI-determined STR allele frequencies reveals that the probability of two unrelated Caucasians having identical STR profiles, or so-called “DNA fingerprints,” is approximately 1 in 575 trillion (Reilly, 2001)

Making an STR Match

In order to match, for example, crime scene evidence to a suspect, a lab would determine the allele profile of the 13 core STRs for both the evidence sample and the suspect’s sample. If the STR alleles do not match between the two samples, the individual would be excluded as the source of the crime scene evidence. However, if the two samples have matching alleles at all 13 STRs, a statistical calculation would be made to determine the frequency with which this genotype is observed in the population. Such a probability calculation takes into account the frequency with which each STR allele occurs in the individual’s ethnic group. Given the population frequency of each STR allele, a simple Hardy-Weinberg calculation gives the frequency of the observed genotype for each STR. Multiplying together the frequencies of the individual STR genotypes then gives the overall profile frequency.

example

 

Suspect b has the same STR sequences and the evidence.

 

 

http://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/forensics-dna-fingerprinting-and-codis-736 

Reilly, P. Legal and public policy issues in DNA forensics. Nature Reviews Genetics 2, 313–317 (2001) doi:10.1038/35066091