What is Design?
This is the question that has consumed the designers of both the past and the present and will most likely still be an issue in the future. Are we upholding the standards and concepts of what design is still allowing for progress and innovation? Are the rules of simplicity and individuality more important than the ideals of progress and economic growth? These are all questions we need to decipher in order to be the designers we aspire to become.
In order to answer these fundamental questions we need to acknowledge the history that has brought design and its principles to where we are today. That “creativity” needs to be lodged somewhere within that history and what the future holds.
Design although somewhat believed to be led by Western Civilization is actually a product of many different cultures. Design has been around since the beginning of humanity. The discovery of tools for weapons and vessels led to the creativity that evolved into design and communication. With this evolution, design and its decoration came to be associated with wealth and symbols of a cultures distinction and power. Design was in a sense driven by the power of the country not necessarily individual creativity but with the Modern Age that began to change. Design began to get back to creative simplicity and individuality at the hands of talented craftspeople but machine production seemed to threaten this concept.
“According the book ‘Pioneers of Modern Design’ by the art historian Sir Nikolaus Pevsner (1902-1983), the concept of design arose from the thinking of two figures: John Ruskin (1819-1900), an advocate of social thought, and William Morris (1834-1896), a theorist and the founder of the Arts and Crafts Movement”(pg. 416). Ruskin and Morris were against this modernism thought and machine age and for that time perhaps rightly so. But there needed to be a balance.
The Bauhaus Movement in Germany was a symbol or beginning of that balance. Designers in this movement embraced the machine production age in a positive way and took a closer look. They were able to combine the principles of individual creativity with modernistic culture. As the future progressed, design started to be fueled or redirected towards economic growth. This brought about the need for “standardization and mass production” to compete in the world. Devastated by war, Japan grew as a strong economic power with this theme of “standardization and mass production” at its forefront.
The United States looked at design with influence from Europe and the Bauhaus Movement as a way to shape its style and identity. Design was a tool for corporate management. In Europe, they seemed to try to get back to the original concepts of individuality, creativity, originality and superb craftsmanship.
So all this brings us to the short-lived age of Postmodernism. This was the new chic term in the 80’s. Here again, we are faced perhaps with a new generation of designers trying to strike that balance with modernism and the current era.
Design today is flooded with ever changing technology and a need to keep up with these advances to remain competitive. So as designers where do we find that balance without being a slave to the economy or driven by technology? I think we need to embrace the original concepts of design, merging them with all the advanced technology that is before us. We can put all this knowledge and innovation together still maintaining our creativity and individuality. We can still be great.