VISU 1311_Project 1 Reflection_Alex Clarke

There were a huge variety of different points that were made throughout everyone’s different pieces, and I thought that a lot of them were really good, and connected in some way to my own work, particularly since the presentation of it was nowhere near what I had hoped. Overall however, there were several that kept popping up in multiple presentations, and so I believe them to be the most pertinent to the reflection.

1) Editing the grouping of all of the photos. I admit it, I did not give myself enough time to fully edit all of my photos. I was not the only one who wasn’t so great at editing though. Looking at all of the images together is really important to make all of them cohesive. It can have a lot of different purposes, like all of the different versions that I saw in many presentations, such as emphasizing a certain group of photos. Two pictures may work together to make each other stronger, or maybe some of the photos cannot be viewed without being grouped together, because when alone they are just too visually boring. Honestly, I wasn’t entirely sure how some of the photos were able to work together, but I suppose that that would really depend a lot on the viewer’s own aesthetic, and how well the images speak to each other.

2) Explaining your purpose is important. It gives the photographer the benefit of the doubt, particularly if they are able to articulate the different functions of their photograph well. A lot of presenters had some difficulty in talking about their work, including myself. The idea was to explain how each of the photographers took the theories of Gestalt and applied them to their photographs, and it was hard to define just how and what principles were at play within each photograph, or what allowed one group of photos to work when compared to other pictures. If anything, we as a group really need to learn how to speak about a larger idea that all of our pictures are trying to convey.

3) Composition of the photographs is really important during editing. Some people simply were too close in their frame, and were unable to see the big picture of the assignment in every photograph. Because of this, many of their pictures were disconnected, or simply claustrophobic. In some cases, the composition just wasn’t clear enough in displaying one type of Gestalt principle, and would have needed many more examples to get the point across.

Overall, I think there were some pretty great photos from everybody. If I were to change my own post though…


VISU 1100: Blog Post #5

Part One:

_MG_9508.CR2

 

This first picture from a project that focused on how to actually take a picture, focusing on the ideals of Gestalt. Containment was a huge element to the picture above, and I really liked how clear the picture came out in the reflection, and how the actual ground remained so out of focus. I tried to look at the different elements of Gestalt separately, finding images that contained more of one thing than another, and that clearly happened with the above.

_MG_4025This second picture came from my Foundation Art and Design class, where we had to study the different element of line, and play around with the effects that line could have. This was the finished product, although the beginnings of the project can be seen behind it. I mainly focused on the negative space that could be achieved with the multiple lines that I was given, and experimented with the sheer chaos of overlapping those lines.


Part Two:

1) The strongest aspect of my work from the Gestalt project was probably the actual composition of all of the images that I put together. I think that post-production turned out really well.

2) My weakest aspect is by far the images that I ended up grouping together in the final product. I definitely did not give myself enough time to properly edit myself, and I think my selections have suffered because of that.

3) I think if the final product is going to be a grouping together of images to demonstrate one compositional aspect, then I need to take photos whose compositions are all fairly similar. I don’t think that the pictures I chose were very similar in that regard; they all demonstrated the same principle, but in different ways, which draws away from their similarity.

4) Conceptually, it really could have used better grouping. That would prove my understanding of the Gestalt principles, and would have made the whole gallery of photos make more sense in relation to one another.

5) Technically, I think that the individual photographs themselves need more explanation. The layout of the gallery felt rather limited to me, but I don’t know enough about how the blog site works in order to change that.