A new way of thinking for a new age is a lofty goal. It’s true that the prominence of creative thinking has skyrocketed in the last century or so but in reality, people have always had to be creative. Necessity is the mother of invention didn’t just appear out of nowhere. People have always had to think on their feet and be on the bleeding edge of technology no matter how primitive technology was at the time. Only now is this way of thinking being glorified. Supply and demand existed long before global economies and the information age, it’s just a matter of perspective.
High tech and high touch is just a prettier way of saying what people have been doing sense the dawn of time. Thinking otherwise is highly ignorant and pitiable. Sure, technology and social climates have changed but the wants and needs haven’t. People have and will continue to want bigger better and cheaper.
If it’s taken the world this long to realize that empathy and general powers of perception are important to all walks of life then something is very wrong. People need to be able to reason just as much as they need to be able thinking critically. Understanding is just as the application, if you can’t apply it practically then clearly your missing something and you need to rethink how you’re going about the task.
Reading this has me extremely frustrated, the author has presented this new high thinking like it’s the greatest thing since sliced bread. People weren’t automatons that could only focus on a single task without any room for growth or change. That’s just not how the world works. People are always growing and changing, adapting to new stimuli and needs. Nothing about that is revolutionary or new it’s all about the practicality, Shakespeare couldn’t have done what he did without the finical backing he got from his sponsor and the only reason he got that backing was because he was really good at what he did and his work as incredibly important.
It’s the same thing with graphic designers and artist today. The work is important and if it want up to quality standards then you flop. Though this argument can be applied to every field of work, blue and white collar. It’s not left or right brain thinking that gets you places it’s how you practically apply all your knowledge and experiences.
What I’m getting from this essay is that Art, or in our case design, is intrinsically linked with history. The phrase “Life imitates Art far more than Art imitates Life” from Oscar Wilde comes to mind. One can’t exist without the other. Art allows us to express ourselves and speak out against injustices in the world and life provides us with motivation and inspiration for art.
Hara touched on a really important subject when it comes to the distribution and availability of art throughout history. Before the invention of the printing press and crude factory machines “art” was produced by hand by master craftsmen that spent their entire life’s perfecting their craft. With the introduction of mass production and industrialization created this massive new school of thought. No longer would it take months of tireless crafting and shaping to produce a new piece of furniture instead a factory could produce hundreds in a month. Scribes would no longer have to spend months transcribing texts for a single recipient instead the printing press could produce a library in half the time.
The availability of information and art skyrocketed within months. With things like the Printing Press Martin Luther’s reformation of the church wouldn’t have been possible. The 95 Theses would have been torn down and forgotten, the bibles German translation would never have been publicized. Religion as we know it and by extension art might be completely different to what we have today. Only can we consider mass produced works to be art? Are the first books produced by the Printing Press comparable to the beauty and penmanship of hand transcribed texts of old? Where is the line in the sand drawn?
People keep pushing for newer and better without appreciating what came before. Through the creation of new mediums, we move farther and farther from our roots. We create fantastic and mindboggling things the human brain can barely comprehend. Ones and zeros come together to for images and texts for us to appreciate and we do but we don’t understand it. You can sit in front of a screen for hours at a time but when asked to explain how it works most people will just stare at you like you asked them to build a rocket from scratch. Granted a rocket is a bit extreme but most people nowadays can’t even draw their own face. We appreciate art but can no longer produce its most simple forms without the assistance of some sort of machine.
As humans we have created a power vacuum in creativity and filled the void with machines. In our quest for new and amazing horizons we’ve ignored the fact that we won’t be able to cross the first ocean we come across. Essentially just because its new doesn’t mean it’s better. Infact as a society we have created a perception that nothing can ever be new. We see the past as a barrier to overcome not a resource to learn from. People always say that if we don’t learn history is doomed to repeat itself if we don’t learn from it but that way of thinking is very limited. We shouldn’t be afraid of our past mistakes instead we should grow and learn from them.
Art is the same way, if we ignore it we gain nothing, if we continually push for the future we fall farther behind. We need to stop and smell the metaphorical roses. We need to stop worrying about what’s right around the corner because we might miss what’s right in front of us. Art is all about the experience and how we let it affect our perception of reality and the world around us.